 |
| Image Source: http://www.bcehs.ca/PublishingImages/BCAS_VAN_033012_113.jpg |
A while ago I stumbled across
this dataset which outlined the call volumes and types of calls which BCAS (
BC Ambulance Service) responded to in the lower-mainland. Although I have plans to use this dataset for some future analysis. At an initial glance, what popped out at me was that the fire department responds on average to about 5% of BC Ambulances calls in the entire lower mainland but, close to 50% of calls in Vancouver itself. (
in 2014)
This piqued my interest and got me wondering. What is the cost structure of the fire department? what is the cost structure of BCAS?
From a cost perspective, I have always wondered how cost effective it is to send 6 firefighters and the large fire truck to that many calls - both from a wage and capital cost perspective. Keep in mind, both BCAS and the Fire Department are paid for with public funds, just at different levels of government, provincial and municipal respectively.
Now, luckily the Vancouver fire department provides an extremely detailed breakdown of their previous years' activities in each municipal budget, these can be found
here. Unfortunately, BCAS provides a much less detailed public budget, as a result, I have had to do my best, scrounging together information from the above dataset, the BCAS 2014 annual report, which can be found
here, and the BCAS 2014 Vancouver demand analysis which can be found
here.
Compiling all this information I obtain the following table, which has also been augmented with wage data from workbc.ca
The
big disclaimer here is that the BCAS expense data for Vancouver and the Lower mainland is entirely estimated at 25% and 50% based off of call volumes in relation to the provincial level. As such these are entirely arbitrary and may have no bearing on reality, but at least provide an insight into these areas.
While the expenses are estimated, the call volumes and labour information is accurate and obtained from the above-noted BCAS reports.
The second disclaimer is that Vancouver Fire provides their staffing information in terms of FTE, while BCAS provides it in terms of regular full-time, irregular full-time and part-time.
Through hear-say I understand that many of these "part-time" paramedics in Vancouver can, and often do, work more than a full-time schedule. But, at the risk of underestimating, I assign each part-time employee only 0.5 FTE while each full-time 1 FTE in calculating the FTE for BCAS in each region.
Finally, for the per crew information, BCAS generally operates in crews of 2 while I understand Vancouver Fire generally operates in crews of 4. (
thank you, Brian, for this update! Also recognizing that Vancouver Fire will operate with as little as 2 for some medical calls. While this changes the number of FTE crew, this does not change the total expenses/call)
Now some discussion of the actual results of the above table.
My first surprise was that only 3% of the Vancouver fire departments calls are actually to deal with fires. Another 25% of their calls are fire inspections, to finish off with 72% of their calls being medical in nature, supporting BC ambulance. That means despite being a fire department (
with their budget being about twice the estimated Vancouver BC ambulance budget) they primarily act in a capacity of being first responders to medical calls.
Now in a bit of preliminary research on this topic. I looked into the importance of first-responders, and empirically it appears that having a fast response time, all else equal, greatly increases the viability of the patient. My question then; does society benefit more when the first responder is from the fire department? or given the cost of fire response, would a modified response structure with BCAS be more cost effective and provide the same patient benefit?
Clearly, the Fire Department provides an extremely valuable service, especially in cases of vehicle accidents and hazardous materials.
Unfortunately, I have not yet worked out from the above dataset, what percentage of Fire calls are due to hazmat or MVI (
Motor Vehicle Incident)
, or just medical, with the request of a first-responder (Fire) crew. This will definitely, be the area of future follow ups! (followed-up here)
To finish off this post, as it has gotten a little long, If we evaluate the cost per call and the wage cost per call between calls in Vancouver for BCAS and the Fire Department we see that:
- Vancouver Fire has a wage cost per call almost 8 times larger than BC ambulance.
- Vancouver Fire has a total cost per call almost 3 times larger than BC ambulance.
Although this data is already 3 years old and pre-fentanyl crisis, I find it fascinating that most of the news coverage on the crisis comes from the fire department, resulting in calls for more department funding when perhaps a more cost effective solution would be to increase ambulance funding and staffing.
But then again, these observations are just from a quick back of the envelope calculation. Perhaps there is much much more to the story.
As I said my interest has been piqued and I now have a good chunk of data to pour over.
Move over real-estate market, I have found a new topic for the next little while.
What are your thoughts? feel free to comment below.
EDIT: In retrospect, this article may seem like I have decided to pick a side in an emergency services battle for supremacy. This is not the case! Rather the above article is purely motivated by my curiosity and surprise based on the results and through this hopefully stir some thought on how these essential services may be provided in a more cost-effective manner!
